- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:02:29 +0100
- To: "SWBPD" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
Presenting my 3 priorities in the previous message I wrote : "From the experience we have with customer companies, they come to semantic technologies and languages first for internal interoperability sake (which is a good thing), but are more relunctant to ensure external interoperability. Either they don't see the point of it, or they consider their internal ontology as a strategic asset to be kept hidden under the hood." The more I think and speak about it, the more critical this seems to me. Was just speaking with a partner, with whom we developed an ontology for a tourism portal, in the framework of an European IST project. We've come to the idea of a poll directed at corporate developers/users of ontologies, either companies or organizations. Seems to me that the result of such a poll could help us to set priorities. Some questions that came to our mind (not exhaustive, just preliminary brainstorming) - Does your organization use ontologies in its applications ? - If not, does it intend to do so in the future ? - What kind of applications do you make of ontologies currently ? - What kind of applications do you intend to develop in the future ? - What kind of strategy would you prefer for your organization ? (set priorities) o Use publicly available ontologies o Adapt/extend publicly available ontologies to fit your business o Develop your own ontologies - If you develop ontologies, do you intend to ... o Make them publicly available on the Web, free of rights? All of them? Part of them? o Make them available under license conditions o Share them only in a protected area (e.g. intranet, entreprise portal applications ...) o Use them only for internal applications - If you develop ontologies, do you consider them as ... o Something to share with the general public o Your organization strategic assets o Not sure about it - If you are not sure about the previous question, is it because ... o You have not thought about it o You have difficulties to see the advantages of either solution o You have difficulties to figure the public-private boarder - Do you consider ontologies would be more efficient if developed by o Individual organizations to fit their specific needs o Public institutions to ensure consensus, authority and trust - Would your organization participate in a public effort for developping/maintaining ontologies in your domain ? - If so, what kind of ROI do you see in such a participation ? - ... Would it be possible to have a slot in the agenda for discussing this poll idea - even over a beer or Pastis ? Bernard PS : I will arrive in Cannes Wednesday 3rd only, around 3:00 pm Bernard Vatant Senior Consultant Knowledge Engineering Mondeca - www.mondeca.com bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
Received on Friday, 27 February 2004 07:02:34 UTC