- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 06:21:26 -0400
- To: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Looks interesting, but I've not studied it myself yet... Dan ----- Forwarded message from Georgi Dimitrov <go_di_2000@yahoo.com> ----- From: Georgi Dimitrov <go_di_2000@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 03:17:20 -0700 (PDT) To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> Subject: Re: [WNET] Announcement: A New WordNet Ontology Was Published Message-ID: <20040830101720.27425.qmail@web20623.mail.yahoo.com> Hi. Forwarding the message about my implementation of Wordnet ontology to the SWBP is exactly what I want. Thank You! Georgi Dimitrov --- Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> wrote: > Hi. Mind if I forward this to the W3C Semantic Web > Best Practices > Working Group? (a publically browsable mailing list) > > cheers, > > Dan > > * Georgi Dimitrov <go_di_2000@yahoo.com> [2004-08-27 > 04:44-0700] > > A New WordNet Ontology Was Published > > > > My Semantic Web implementation of WordNet 2.0 can > be > > found at http://truesense.net/wordnet.01.owl.zip > and > > http://truesense.net/words.en.01.owl.zip > > (two ontologies in fact) > > > > changes I have made to the original Wordnet: > > > > . Relations with inverse counterparts were > dropped: > > hyponym, member meronym, substance meronym, part > > meronym, member of this domain - CATEGORY, member > of > > this domain - REGION, member of this domain - > USAGE > > . relations between words are not more synset > > dependent > > . More than 8360 synsets were transformed into > > individuals > > . The relation 'hypernym' was replaced by > > rdfs:subClassOf or rdf:type properties. > > . Lexicographer files, lex_ids and syntactic > markers > > were not included in this ontology. > > . Words were placed in a different ontology > > (words.en.01.owl) because I plan to use them with > > other ontologies and applications. > > > > Georgi Y. Dimitrov
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 10:21:26 UTC