Re: [WNET] Announcement: A New WordNet Ontology Was Published

Looks interesting, but I've not studied it myself yet...

Dan

----- Forwarded message from Georgi Dimitrov <go_di_2000@yahoo.com> -----

From: Georgi Dimitrov <go_di_2000@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 03:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [WNET] Announcement: A New WordNet Ontology Was Published
Message-ID: <20040830101720.27425.qmail@web20623.mail.yahoo.com>

Hi. Forwarding the message about my implementation of
Wordnet ontology to the SWBP is exactly what I want.
Thank You!

Georgi Dimitrov


--- Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi. Mind if I forward this to the W3C Semantic Web
> Best Practices
> Working Group? (a publically browsable mailing list)
> 
> cheers,
> 
> Dan
> 
> * Georgi Dimitrov <go_di_2000@yahoo.com> [2004-08-27
> 04:44-0700]
> > A New WordNet Ontology Was Published
> > 
> > My Semantic Web implementation of WordNet 2.0 can
> be
> > found at http://truesense.net/wordnet.01.owl.zip
> and
> > http://truesense.net/words.en.01.owl.zip
> > (two ontologies in fact)
> > 
> > changes I have made to the original Wordnet:
> > 
> > . Relations with inverse counterparts were
> dropped:
> > hyponym, member meronym, substance meronym, part
> > meronym, member of this domain - CATEGORY, member
> of
> > this domain - REGION, member of this domain -
> USAGE
> > . relations between words are not more synset
> > dependent
> > . More than 8360 synsets were transformed into
> > individuals
> > . The relation 'hypernym' was replaced by
> > rdfs:subClassOf or rdf:type properties.
> > . Lexicographer files, lex_ids and syntactic
> markers
> > were not included in this ontology.
> > . Words were placed in a different ontology
> > (words.en.01.owl) because I plan to use them with
> > other ontologies and applications.
> > 
> > Georgi Y. Dimitrov

Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 10:21:26 UTC