- From: Uschold, Michael F <michael.f.uschold@boeing.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:29:31 -0700
- To: "Natasha Noy" <noy@smi.stanford.edu>, "Yoshio FUKUSHIGE" <fuku@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>
My initial reaction is that modeling probabilities is something that is likely to come up frequently, and a note discussing this would be valuable. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Natasha Noy [mailto:noy@smi.stanford.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:28 PM To: Yoshio FUKUSHIGE Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org Subject: Re: on the treatment of certainty (in "Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web: Use With Individuals") Dear Yoshio, Your discussion of different treatment of probabilities is very interesting. While I don't think it is quite relevant to the note on n-ary relations -- the goal of that note was to discuss something different and we used probability just as an example -- it may be useful to have a set of design patterns for different ways to treat probabilities and uncertainty in RDF and OWL. Perhaps, we can have a separate note specifying patterns for this? Folks on OEP TF, what do you think? If people find it generally useful, Yoshio, would you be interested in contributing such a note? > > "It seems with high probability that Christine has breast tumor." This is the interpretation that we had in mind. Natasha
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2004 18:30:25 UTC