- From: Lynn, James (Software Services) <james.lynn@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:07:18 -0500
- To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-sw-meaning@w3.org>
Can someone state the "trusted" problem for me? Is it 1. Do I trust the veracity of a graph? 2. Do I trust the identity of the graph's author? 3. Both? Thanks, James > -----Original Message----- > From: public-sw-meaning-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-sw-meaning-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Mark Baker > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 11:36 AM > To: Sandro Hawke > Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org > Subject: Re: Self-descriptive assertions > > > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:51:06PM -0500, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > Does that make sense? (I'm not saying it very well.) Turn the > > "asserted" problem over to the "trusted" problem, because > if you can't > > solve the "trusted" problem (well-enough for your app), > you're out of > > luck anyway. > > Thanks Sandro, yes I think that does make sense, but > unfortunately it's > not a self-descriptive solution. That is, I can't - in Dan's > terms[1] - > "follow my nose" from an HTTP/RDF message to an understanding > of whether > or not the graph inside that message is asserted. > > I agree that the whole "trust" thing is closely related, but I also > think that it's orthogonal to assertedness. > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0162.html > > Mark. > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 13:11:04 UTC