- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:36:27 -0500
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-sw-meaning@w3.org
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:51:06PM -0500, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Does that make sense? (I'm not saying it very well.) Turn the > "asserted" problem over to the "trusted" problem, because if you can't > solve the "trusted" problem (well-enough for your app), you're out of > luck anyway. Thanks Sandro, yes I think that does make sense, but unfortunately it's not a self-descriptive solution. That is, I can't - in Dan's terms[1] - "follow my nose" from an HTTP/RDF message to an understanding of whether or not the graph inside that message is asserted. I agree that the whole "trust" thing is closely related, but I also think that it's orthogonal to assertedness. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2002Oct/0162.html Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2004 11:29:14 UTC