Re: Various out-of-date SVG-in-OT specs/drafts

Sairus Patel:
> 1. Cam, others,
> 
> Several folks are somehow finding the unofficial editors draft http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/fonts/SVG-OpenType.html doc and asking questions. While it does have a disclaimer, folks are still reading it and confused.
> 
> Would it be possible to somehow indicate clearly that it’s not valid any more and that
> https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/svg.htm and
> https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/colr.htm
> should be consulted instead?

I’ve added a prominent warning and pointed to the OpenType
specification.

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Wednesday, 20 January 2016 22:33:25 UTC