On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Levantovsky, Vladimir < Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com> wrote: > Regarding the UA style sheet – if we agree that the use of text elements > as part of the SVG glyph description doesn’t make sense and should be > disallowed, the solution you proposed would be one a way to implement the > restriction; however I would imagine that in some cases the SVG-enabled OFF > implementations may not support the concept of UA style sheet and would > have to do something else to restrict the use of text elements > Any implementation hack that forces the font-size to zero would work. > BTW, is there a chance that font-size value defined as part of the SVG > text element would override UA style sheet definition? > > No. I think that regardless of _*how*_ the restriction can be implemented it > needs to be mentioned as part of the spec proper, similar to e.g. how we > specify limitations on rendering of animated content [using secure > animation mode]. This would be useful for both rendering engine > implementers and for tool vendors. > Yes. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 20:32:42 UTC