- From: onyx labo <onyxtechlabo@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 07:30:01 +0900
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Vladimir Levantovsky <Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com>, public-svgopentype@w3.org, Sairus Patel <sppatel@adobe.com>, "Adam Twardoch (List)" <list.adam@twardoch.com>
- Message-ID: <CAEHJ6fm1mKa_Bpc8x9cukGpzatyTLsrq2kyu6nQSBJuMwRpN2g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello all, Thanks for the explanation. I think I probably understand the process to fix the standardization. However I have a suggestion which I sent the another mail thread. How do I have to discuss it with this community members before standardization?? onyx 2013/10/18 1:05 "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>: > Hello Adam, > > Thursday, October 17, 2013, 4:43:15 PM, you wrote: > > > So in a nutshell, expressing the "commitment" essentially means that we > > stop working on the SVG-in-OT spec in the "SVG in OpenType community > > group" and the work will be (hopefully, presumably) picked up by OFF, > > where further work on this will be done -- correct? > > Exactly. Community Groups produce specifications but they don't > produce standards. > > > In a way, this is similar to where Microsoft or Apple etc. prepares a > > proposal internally and then submits it to the OFF for further > > discussion. > > Yes, except this one was produced by an open consensus process between > multiple companies; and it comes with some patent protection licensing > that includes RAND but extends it to include 'no fee and no written > license' > > > In this case, the community group was like Microsoft or > > Apple, i.e. this has been an "internal" discussion and proposal so far > > -- but once we all sign off on it here in the community group, someone > > (W3C?) can submit that proposal to OFF. Right? > > W3C will indeed submit it. > > > If that's the case, I'm happy to recommend everyone to "express > > commitment", so we can move the discussion and the proposal into the > > more formalized place (OFF, that is). > > Thanks. > > As of right now we have licensing commitments from 7 of the 18 > participants. For W3C Member companies the commitment is made by the > Advisory Committe representative on behalf of all participants from > that company. So for example I understand that Adobe is working on > this and they have six participants, so that commitment would take the > total to 13 out of 18. > > http://www.w3.org/community/svgopentype/spec/63/commitments > > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:chris@w3.org > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 October 2013 22:30:29 UTC