- From: Sairus Patel <sppatel@adobe.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:28:13 -0700
- To: "public-svgopentype@w3.org" <public-svgopentype@w3.org>
[was: Unified draft of SVG-in-OT] Hi Nikos, good catch, thanks. I was just expressing to Cameron offlist my hesitation about the user agent style sheet allowing the context's stroke properties (width, opacity, etc) to be used. All: just so I understand this correctly: can font designers design their SVG descriptions so that choose that strokes do *not* inherit the context's stroke properties? Sairus -----Original Message----- From: Nikos Andronikos <nikos.andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au> Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 5:22 PM To: "public-svgopentype@w3.org" <public-svgopentype@w3.org> Subject: Re: Unified draft of SVG-in-OT Resent-From: "public-svgopentype@w3.org" <public-svgopentype@w3.org> Resent-Date: Thursday, July 25, 2013 5:22 PM >Hi guys, > >Generally looks good. > >I do have one question. >The proposal notes that the font bounding box in the head table must be >suitable for static renderings of the glyph. >How is this possible considering features of the glyph may be set >through parameters? >e.g. the user may specify a stroke width of any size. > >Cheers, >Nikos > >The information contained in this email message and any attachments may >be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional >privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference >with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and >prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately >advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your >system. >
Received on Friday, 26 July 2013 15:29:04 UTC