Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Regarding landing the resolution of https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12376 in a SVG Spec.

Hi Karl, Thanks for the response

For the edits, is it possible for me to contribute to the spec links which Alan shared? I can add you as a reviewer in that PR and we can expedite the process; I would appreciate your guidance on which GitHub repository I should raise the PR in, and whether I have the necessary permissions to do so.
Also based on the discussion in [1], should we instead wait for the Respec to happen first?

[1] Publish current status of SVG · Issue #938 · w3c/svgwg<https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/938#issuecomment-3195722304>
With Regards
Divyansh
________________________________
From: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2025 13:21
To: Divyansh Mangal <dmangal@microsoft.com>
Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org <public-svg-wg@w3.org>; Ragvesh Sharma <ragsharma@microsoft.com>; Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>; Daniel Clark <daniec@microsoft.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Regarding landing the resolution of https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12376 in a SVG Spec.

[You don't often get email from karl@la-grange.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Hi Divyansh,

> Le 2025/08/23 à 05:55, Divyansh Mangal <dmangal@microsoft.com> a écrit :
> Resolution :
> "content dependent units used in width and height for inner SVG elements resolve to SVG's definition of auto"

Alan mentioned [1]

* https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsvgwg.org%2Fsvg2-draft%2Fgeometry.html%23Sizing&data=05%7C02%7Cdmangal%40microsoft.com%7C3020e7f4776a4d62db9908dde219f571%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638915323364370795%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VuOi8jijPuC0xEILzrc%2BjJY1egEEXdUc6BGTlqVIN8w%3D&reserved=0<https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/geometry.html#Sizing>
* or https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsvgwg.org%2Fsvg2-draft%2Fstyling.html%23TermPresentationAttribute&data=05%7C02%7Cdmangal%40microsoft.com%7C3020e7f4776a4d62db9908dde219f571%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638915323364381911%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=5TE0Q8KYgqkEeQMGw05RBeycW4VF0ZlACYhtCjnFDs4%3D&reserved=0<https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/styling.html#TermPresentationAttribute>

for the edits. I can check if I can write something without making a fool of myself.



> We wanted to introduce/edit this resolution in a SVG spec if possible, we wanted to understand what is the procedure for that?
> is there a timeline for landing this change? Also, in which SVG spec can this change even be landed , in SVG2.0 spec or some other spec?

We have discussions about making edits more visible [2].

[1]: https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fcsswg-drafts%2Fissues%2F12376%23issuecomment-3215555873&data=05%7C02%7Cdmangal%40microsoft.com%7C3020e7f4776a4d62db9908dde219f571%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638915323364389628%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vq%2B7Q0p2%2FiX1mHIcdEoLBJy85vpJdZ3IquwwKJNK93k%3D&reserved=0<https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/12376#issuecomment-3215555873>
[2]: https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fw3c%2Fsvgwg%2Fissues%2F938%23issuecomment-3195722304&data=05%7C02%7Cdmangal%40microsoft.com%7C3020e7f4776a4d62db9908dde219f571%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638915323364396891%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CWp6qrR7b2ZCirQZEDsEgaY7JUWu1FDjWIbgI624eN4%3D&reserved=0<https://github.com/w3c/svgwg/issues/938#issuecomment-3195722304>


--
Karl Dubost