Re: SVG2 Accessibility User Agent Implementation Guide

Yes, the CSS WG and the SVG WG have a joined task force called FXTF. Members from both WGs can be in the TF without being in the other WG. CSS Transforms[1] is one document beside others that the TF produces.

Something that would need to be clarified is the authority. Do we need to ask both WGs to resolve on each issue? This is something that is not fully clarified in the FX TF and I often still end up asking both WGs to agree individually. It would be nice to have an active veto right of both WGs but let the TF get to there own decisions in the first place.

To be fair, an issue with the FX TF is that most members don’t show up in meetings or not even reply to mails. Hopefully that is not the case for he PF/SVG TF.

Greetings,
Dirk

[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-transforms/



On Mar 28, 2014, at 7:57 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> ok. Michael, Please draw up at task force work statement for review. 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> 
> <graycol.gif>Michael Cooper ---03/28/2014 10:49:55 AM---We can set up a joint task force that allows people from SVG to join the  TF without joining PF. The
> 
> From:	Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
> To:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, dschulze@adobe.com
> Cc:	SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>, SVG public list <www-svg@w3.org>, W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>, janina@rednote.net
> Date:	03/28/2014 10:49 AM
> Subject:	Re: SVG2 Accessibility User Agent Implementation Guide
> 
> 
> 
> We can set up a joint task force that allows people from SVG to join the TF without joining PF. The task force work statement would indicate that the work product is solely a deliverable of PF and under its patent obligations. Members from SVG who cannot accept that can decline to join the TF. Or if they want to formalize that they have accepted putting the deliverable under the PF patent obligations, they may choose to join PF even though it's not a requirement from our side to join the task force. Michael
> 
> On 28/03/2014 11:41 AM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> 
> Dirk, Michael, 
> 
> The SVG working group resolved to have the this document be a PF document that would be worked on by a PF/SVG task force run in PF and fall under that IP policy. Would this require people who wanted to participate from SVG join PF?
> 
> Rich
> 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger 
> 
>

Received on Saturday, 29 March 2014 08:22:29 UTC