- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:56:58 +0100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:48:28 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > I wanted to sign off on SVG 2 as it is currently so that we can publish > another WD of it. I meant to add that to the agenda for last week but > forgot. > > Could people who are interested in reviewing to make sure they are happy > with the WD publication please read through the parts changed since the > FPWD -- they should all have been marked with a yellow background, > class="ready-for-wg-review" -- so that we can resolve to publish at the > next telcon? (There is no handy index, I'm afraid, although you could > perform a diff of the changes.html appendix to get a high level > overview. I still need to do the work to separate that out into > "changes since SVG 1.1 SE" and "changes since the last WD".) > > Thanks, > > Cameron There are some minor editorial things I think would be good to fix before publishing, such as making sure the produced spec text doesn't contain e.g "@@ unknown element/term". The changes appendix needs to be updated too, it's not "changes since SVG 1.1", it should be changes since the last SVG2 WD. Apart from that I think it's good to go. -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 19:57:33 UTC