Re: SVG 2 requirements with annotations in the spec but no owner from Cameron McCormack on 2012-08-18 (public-svg-wg@w3.org from July to September 2012)

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:53:49 +1000
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
CC: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <50302B0D.5030200@mcc.id.au>

Dirk Schulze:
> I would disagree. This is just the FPWD. So there might still be changes and some ideas might still be addressed in the next WD. For instance "Arbitrary fills for shapes" was something that I want to bring up on the next SVG WG discussion. Also, what does "remove" mean? I thought we want to keep the annotations in our source code for documentation reasons?

OK, but I was hoping the annotations to be an accurate representation of 
what features people in the group had signed up to work on.

I've made the annotations corresponding to requirements be visible by 
default in the about-to-be-published WD.

Received on Saturday, 18 August 2012 23:54:19 UTC