Re: SVG 2 rendering model from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-08-03 (public-svg-wg@w3.org from July to September 2012)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 10:58:30 -0700
To: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com>
Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, Nikos Andronikos <nikos.andronikos@cisra.canon.com.au>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDASM1UvHJaTtGw9Q_vHqON=bcuDetC7rX9xiTSsoN_6SA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@adobe.com> wrote:
>> For SVG, I think that having a non-0 or 1 value of opacity
>> on a group would very clearly force it into isolated.
> This will give unexpected results since adding a <g> with 99.99999% opacity might render very different than with 100% opacity

Note that this is already true in CSS.  It's sometimes a good thing!

~TJ

Received on Friday, 3 August 2012 17:59:18 UTC