- From: Alex Danilo <adanilo@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:39:46 +1100
- To: Cyril Concolato <Cyril.Concolato@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Cc: SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAGdNekSEjMm4eam5HDnyPb92Tw++Zhev2dvZg09f8yGy-BD97w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Cyril, On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Cyril Concolato < Cyril.Concolato@cisra.canon.com.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > Following today's telcon, Nikos and I have worked on a new wiki page [1] > to gather the commitments to work on the requirements. It should be more > readable and easier to see what everyone will be working on. Please add > your commitment as Cameron indicated to this page [1]. > Looks great, good work! > The page also indicates our guess, for each requirement, if a written > proposal should be made or if someone can go and edit the spec > (ACTION-3253). It should give a better understanding of the work to be done. > > The page was created based on other wiki pages and on previous > resolutions. It may contain errors or miss requirements, hopefully not too > many. For instance I don't know what to do with the <canvas> question that > Alex raised [2]. So feel free, to add more with a link to a resolution and > to fix the mistakes if any. > Not that troublemaker again:-) Here's the mail thread I started last July by the looks of it, there are a bunch of follow up emails but it should give better context of the discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2011Jul/0081.html Cheers, Alex > Regards, > Cyril > > [1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Commitments > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2012JanMar/0081.html > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au] > > Sent: Friday, 23 March 2012 8:50 AM > > To: SVG WG > > Subject: commitments to work on SVG 2 features > > > > As we discussed in the telcon today, we are now (basically) at the point > where > > we want to prioritise the list of requirements we have for SVG 2, since > we > > obviously will not be able to work on all >100 accepted requirements > within a > > reasonable timeframe. We will be doing this by having each of us, SVG WG > > members, put our hands up to commit to working on specific requirements > -- > > that includes developing a proposal (if one is required), doing spec > edits, and > > working on tests. Cyril has placed "Commitment" below each accepted > > requirement on > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Requirements_Input and > > that's where you can put your name. > > > > Let's aim for having our commitments entered by next telcon, 29 March. > > > > Note that our timeframe we have on > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/wiki/SVG2_Planning_Page is to have a > > LCWD by January 2013, so 9 months away. Consider how many features you > > will be able to drive to spec text completion by that time. (Some > feature > > requests will obviously be more work than others, so make sure to take > that > > into consideration too.) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Cameron > > The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be > confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. > If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, > disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If > you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender > by return email and delete the information from your system. >
Received on Friday, 23 March 2012 03:40:15 UTC