- From: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
- Date: Mon, 28 May 2012 11:50:09 +0200
- To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>, SVG WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2012-05-28 at 09:35 +0200, Erik Dahlstrom wrote: > On Sun, 27 May 2012 03:00:43 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> > wrote: > > > Tavmjong Bah: > >> One styling issue I would like to bring up is that of figures. SVG 1.1 > >> has quite inconsistent figures. Some are very small, others large. A few > >> are quite garish. When I redid the pserver section I tried to make all > >> the figures in a consistent way (similar sizes, colors, fonts, arrow > >> styling, etc.). > > > > Fixing up all the figures in the spec would be great. Choosing a > > palette of common colours to use across figures is also a good idea. I > > am not quite sure about the set of colours in the gradient images (but > > of course it's going to be subjective again). It's better than then red > > -> yellow -> green -> blue gradients, though! Yup, colors are subjective. I am not married to the colors I used. I think I was inspired by a figure that Vincent showed in his talk at Open 2011 that had shades of purple. > > In the figures I've been working on in painting.html, I've enjoyed using > > deeppink. I think if much of the time a figure can stick to using one > > colour, and black/grey for other elements, then we can avoid garishness. > > For example in > > https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/images/painting/markers-repeating.svg the > > black works well against the deeppink i think. I wanted two highlight > > colours for > > https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/images/painting/linejoin-construction.svg > > so the green there is the complement (approximately) of the deeppink. Despite singing "Pink is my favorite color" to my little girls, I am not a big fan of pink. It does, however, seem to work well in small quantities as in the two examples. The green does go well with it. Keeping to black/grey where possible is a good idea. > > As I mentioned in the call, most of the existing 1.1 figures have a thin > > blue border around them, in the actual SVG file. For the painting.html > > figures I removed that and put a thin grey border around the <img> in > > CSS. I think that looks clean, but I see that your figures in > > pservers.html don't have borders at all (or a white background). The > > css3-fonts images also don't have borders, and they look nice. I might > > try removing it from the painting.html ones and see how it looks. I don't think most figures need a border but if they do a grey or black border is definitely nicer than the blue. > > (The fact that some of the figures I have in painting.html are inside > > blocks with background colours (like inside a <div class="example">) > > suggested to me that the white background colour for the <img> was > > needed.) > > How about using one external stylesheet containing our colorscheme of > choice, and let that be referenced from all the spec examples? > Not a bad idea. A Wiki page with some guidelines might also be good to put together. Tav
Received on Monday, 28 May 2012 09:50:44 UTC