- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:17:05 +0200
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: "public-svg-wg >> SVG WG" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Thursday, May 17, 2012, 8:18:19 AM, Cameron wrote: CM> Hi Chris, CM> Since image/svg+xml is now actually registered, does this mean we can CM> remove the appendix from SVG 2? Or do we need to keep it and update it CM> so that it can point to itself (i.e. SVG 2) rather than SVG 1.1? Since we are keeping backwards compatibility (the existing registration works for SVG 1.0, 1.1, 1.2T) I think we can just remove it. We would only need it if we were registering a new, SVG2-only type (which would be a very bad idea). -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 14:17:53 UTC