- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:50:59 +1200
- To: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On 3/08/11 8:04 PM, Jonathan Watt wrote: > By "normal evolution" do you mean future evolution, or the past evolution? I meant evolving from not existing to "complete" in some sense. > Personally I was thinking we could add rational sections anywhere they > may be useful for future WG discussion where WG members might ask "why > was it done that way, and can we tweak that?", or useful for > implementers. I'm sure no one is going to be going out of their way to > systematically go through the existing text investigating and trying to > add this stuff, but when "why did we do it that way?" questions come up > in the WG, it would seem like a good idea to be able to throw a summary > of what the old heads recall into a rational paragraph somewhere in the > spec. Whatever part of the spec that relates to. Sure. Maybe we don't need to be too strict about the process here -- if there is a documented decision, we can link to it and write a sentence or two of rationale in one of these <div class=rationale> sections.
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 21:51:35 UTC