- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:30:16 +0100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:14:13 +0100, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > We have a problem with the test(s) 'shapes-polygon-02-t.svg' and > by implication the test 'shapes-polygon-03-t.svg'. > > A minor issue is that 'shapes-polygon-02-t.svg' as a test exists > in Tiny 1.2 and 1.1F2 with different content. > > The Tiny 1.2 test (using embed) is here: > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20080912/htmlEmbedHarness/shapes-polygon-02-t.html > > The 1.1F2 test is here: > > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObjectMiniApproved/shapes-polygon-02-t.html > > They are completely different tests (agreed that they refer to different > specs. but > shouldn't we avoid this sort of aliasing in the test suites)? Ideally yes. The tiny 1.2 tests were marked as drafts some months ago: http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/shapes-polyline-02-t.svg http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/shapes-polygon-02-t.svg This relates to ISSUE-2375. Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 09:30:51 UTC