- From: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:30:16 +0100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 01:14:13 +0100, Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have a problem with the test(s) 'shapes-polygon-02-t.svg' and
> by implication the test 'shapes-polygon-03-t.svg'.
>
> A minor issue is that 'shapes-polygon-02-t.svg' as a test exists
> in Tiny 1.2 and 1.1F2 with different content.
>
> The Tiny 1.2 test (using embed) is here:
> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/20080912/htmlEmbedHarness/shapes-polygon-02-t.html
>
> The 1.1F2 test is here:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/harness/htmlObjectMiniApproved/shapes-polygon-02-t.html
>
> They are completely different tests (agreed that they refer to different
> specs. but
> shouldn't we avoid this sort of aliasing in the test suites)?
Ideally yes.
The tiny 1.2 tests were marked as drafts some months ago:
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/shapes-polyline-02-t.svg
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/shapes-polygon-02-t.svg
This relates to ISSUE-2375.
Cheers
/Erik
--
Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 09:30:51 UTC