- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:54:45 +0100
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Friday, January 21, 2011, 7:02:48 AM, Cameron wrote: CM> Dimitri Glazkov is writing up use cases for the component model of XBL2: CM> http://wiki.whatwg.org/index.php?title=Component_Model_Use_Cases#Using_Shadow_DOM_Boundary_for_Isolation CM> It might be worth us thinking about whether we have anything to CM> contribute here. It seems that XBL2 is probably going in the direction CM> of being a part of the HTML language, but we should see how applicable CM> it can be to SVG, too. CM> heycam: @dglazkov it occurs to me that us SVG folks should take a look CM> and contribute some use cases we had when were considering RCC/sXBL. CM> that ok? CM> https://twitter.com/heycam/status/28328762697318400 CM> dklazkov: @heycam sure thing. Just don't mention XML or namespaces. I CM> am highly allergic :P CM> https://twitter.com/dglazkov/status/28329152981504000 So, this is only for SVG in the HTML serialisation? Or is it expected to work in the unmentionable serialisation as well? Furthermore, the HTML parser puts HTML elements in the HTML unmentionable and puts SVG elements in terh SVG unmentionable so I hope XBL2 is going to be unmentionable aware even if the author is unmentionable omitted redacted we don't have that here, sonny. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 14:54:08 UTC