- From: Tavmjong Bah <tavmjong@free.fr>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:17:35 +0100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 22:11 +0100, Chris Lilley wrote:
> On Friday, December 10, 2010, 9:47:46 PM, Tavmjong wrote:
>
> TB> Hi,
>
> TB> I've completed running through the test suite for Inkscape and checked
> TB> in the results. One can see a three way comparison between your favorite
> TB> browser, Inkscape, and the reference image at:
>
> TB> http://tavmjong.free.fr/INKSCAPE/W3C_SVG_1.1F2/harness/htmlInkscapeApproved/index.html
>
> TB> Note that Inkscape does not support interactivity or scripting so a good
> TB> fraction of the test fail automatically.
>
> Actually, no. SVG defines a number of conformance classes; non-interactive static SVG renderers (of which Inkscape is an example since interaction is used for editing) should put "not applicable" rather than "fail" for tests which are not pertinent to the class of conformance claimed.
That makes sense but "Not Applicable" isn't an option in the current implementation matrix which has only OK, Partial, and Fail. Can it be added?
http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/status/implementation_matrix.html
Tav
Received on Monday, 10 January 2011 21:18:11 UTC