- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:06:08 -0700
- To: Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Erik Dahlstrom <ed@opera.com> wrote: > I think the shared properties resolution should be reworded slightly. It > would be nice if the CSS WG coordinated when adding properties that could be > useful for svg too. I'd drop "random" from the resolution. Any change to an > existing shared property will need coordination between the groups, any new > shared properties can probably be handled in an SVG spec if it affects svg - > or directly in a CSS spec if that's deemed more appropriate when > coordinating. Any ideas on how to determine when a CSS property may be useful for SVG? I believe there are some easy guidelines (anything to do with layout isn't useful for SVG), but, for example, how much of the Image Values spec is useful? ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 29 June 2011 17:08:18 UTC