Re: XML 1.1, 2nd Ed. - XHTML + MathML + SVG Normative Reference?

Hi Glenn.

Glenn Adams:
> I notice in the normative references section the reference:
> 
> *[XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG]*
> 
> @@fixme "An XHTML + MathML + SVG Profile", M. Ishikawa editor, 9 August
> 2002. Available at:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG-20020809/
> 
> Will this referenced document go to REC prior to moving this PR to REC?

No.

> If not, then perhaps it should be changed to an informative reference,
> since it would be bad form to publish a REC with a normative reference
> to a W3C WD.

Yes, it seems like this should be an informative reference, since none
of SVG’s requirements are dependent on those in that document.  Whether
this is a change we can make now that the document is in PR is another
question: Doug, do you know if this is OK?

-- 
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/

Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 22:02:34 UTC