- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:34:51 +1300
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Cameron McCormack: > > So that means the reference image is incorrect, yes? Chris Lilley: > Yes. So I’ve come back to looking at this test, and I am not sure that the pass criteria are valid or that the reference image is incorrect after all. Here is a passage from text.html#FontsTablesBaselines: For example, Western glyphs are aligned on the bottoms of the capital letters, northern indic glyphs are aligned at the top of a horizontal stroke near the top of the glyphs and far-eastern glyphs are aligned either at the bottom or center of the glyph. Within a script and within a line of text having a single font-size, the sequence of alignment-points defines, in the inline-progression-direction, a geometric line called a baseline. Western and most other alphabetic and syllabic glyphs are aligned to an "alphabetic" baseline, the northern indic glyphs are aligned to a "hanging" baseline and the far-eastern glyphs are aligned to an "ideographic" baseline. The key here is "within a line of text having a single font-size". The need to have a single font size for baseline alignment is mentioned in the text.html#FontsTablesBaselines section too. So I would suggest either dropping text-align-07-t and text-align-08-b back to unapproved for now, or editing them to use the correct baselines (if people are amenable to the test being changed at this late stage). -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2010 08:35:30 UTC