- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:46:46 +0100
- To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Thursday, November 18, 2010, 10:32:38 AM, Erik wrote: ED> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:54:08 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> ED> wrote: >> Erik Dahlstrom: >>> I went ahead and made the change[3], it can be reverted if there are >>> any objections. >> Do you need port back the definitions for paced animation from 1.2T to >> 1.1? ED> Sure, if the group agrees that the clarifications for paced animation from ED> 1.2T should be included then I can take that action, no problem. Yes, those are useful clarifications. -- Chris Lilley Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead, Fonts Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG Member, CSS, WebFonts, SVG Working Groups
Received on Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:47:05 UTC