- From: Sandy Roberts <sandro@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:44:15 +0000
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Ahh I forgot to add -- Patrick also updated this case to have it show a visible pass condition. Thanks! Sandy Roberts -----Original Message----- From: Sandy Roberts Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2010 10:43 AM To: 'Cameron McCormack'; public-svg-wg@w3.org Subject: RE: review comments on struct-cond-overview-02-f.svg Hi Cameron, It seems to be that this would be better as a separate test instead of adding it to struct-cond-overview-02-f.svg. It falls a little outside the scope of the original test case. I don't mind making a case for it though. Thanks! Sandy Roberts -----Original Message----- From: public-svg-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-svg-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Cameron McCormack Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 9:01 PM To: public-svg-wg@w3.org Subject: review comments on struct-cond-overview-02-f.svg The test is fine, but I would like to see sub-tests that check that a <use> element referencing a child element (without a conditional attribute) of some element that does have a failing conditional attribute is rendered. Something like <g systemLanguage="BAD"> <rect id="r" y="-500" width="100" height="100" fill="green"/> </g> <use xlink:href="#r" y="500"/> (The trick with the y just to make sure that the actual green rect isn’t rendered, in case the systemLanguage is ignored.) -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:47:00 UTC