W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > July to September 2010

RE: 1.1 2nd edition last call comment : fill-rule on text elements

From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:28:51 -0700
To: "'Alex Danilo'" <alex@abbra.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>, SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D23D6B9E57D654429A9AB6918CACEAA97D22B4110D@NAMBX02.corp.adobe.com>
But couldn't you achieve the same thing by putting the fill-rule on a <g> instead of the <text>?

-----Original Message-----
From: public-svg-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-svg-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alex Danilo
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:11 PM
To: Cameron McCormack
Cc: Patrick Dengler; SVG Working Group WG
Subject: Re: 1.1 2nd edition last call comment : fill-rule on text elements


For the record they render differently in Vidualize as well (i.e. as they should).


--Original Message--:
>Patrick Dengler:
>> We don't believe fill-rule belongs on text elements.
>> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/painting.html#FillProperties

>> We cannot think of a scenario where this would apply to text.
>> We would like to make this minor adjustment to the spec (remove
>> application to text) unless we are missing something.
>It applies in the case of SVG Fonts, where complex glyphs inherit
>properties from the text content element that references them.  The two
><text> elements in http://mcc.id.au/2010/text-fill-rule.svg render
>differently in Batik.
>Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/


Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 00:29:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:43 UTC