- From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:28:51 -0700
- To: "'Alex Danilo'" <alex@abbra.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: Patrick Dengler <patd@microsoft.com>, SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
But couldn't you achieve the same thing by putting the fill-rule on a <g> instead of the <text>? -----Original Message----- From: public-svg-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-svg-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alex Danilo Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 8:11 PM To: Cameron McCormack Cc: Patrick Dengler; SVG Working Group WG Subject: Re: 1.1 2nd edition last call comment : fill-rule on text elements +1. For the record they render differently in Vidualize as well (i.e. as they should). Alex --Original Message--: >Patrick Dengler: >> We don't believe fill-rule belongs on text elements. >> >> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/painting.html#FillProperties >> >> We cannot think of a scenario where this would apply to text. >> >> We would like to make this minor adjustment to the spec (remove >> application to text) unless we are missing something. > >It applies in the case of SVG Fonts, where complex glyphs inherit >properties from the text content element that references them. The two ><text> elements in http://mcc.id.au/2010/text-fill-rule.svg render >differently in Batik. > >-- >Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/ > >
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 00:29:40 UTC