- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:05:42 +0100
- To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
- CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
On Friday, March 19, 2010, 4:19:41 PM, Erik wrote: ED> Hello, ED> I'm wondering what to do with the RTL testcases in SVG1.1F2, which are ED> affected by the clarified wording for RTL text alignment in SVGT1.2. ED> This affects this test: ED> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/fonts-glyph-02-t.svg ED> which has a counterpart in the SVGT1.2 testsuite: ED> ED> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/htmlObjectHarness/fonts-glyph-02-t.html ED> For reference, see definitions of 'text-anchor' in SVG1.1[1] and ED> SVGT1.2[2], and the sections on bidi handling[3][4]. FWIW I think 1.2T ED> conveys the intent of the SVG 1.1 spec, so I think backporting the changes ED> made for the RTL text tests in the 1.2T testsuite to the SVG1.1F2 ED> testsuite would be reasonable. I agree, its a clarification so the better wording should be backported. And I think this is one of the 1.2T tescases that should be backported to the 1.1F2 harness to as its a better test. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2010 15:05:43 UTC