- From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:37:10 +1100
- To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Erik, I agree totally with what you propose. If you'd like me to review the changed tests, feel free to ask. Cheers, Alex --Original Message--: >Hello, > >I'm wondering what to do with the RTL testcases in SVG1.1F2, which are >affected by the clarified wording for RTL text alignment in SVGT1.2. > >This affects this test: > > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/fonts-glyph-02-t.svg > >which has a counterpart in the SVGT1.2 testsuite: > > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/htmlObjectHarness/fonts-glyph-02-t.html > >For reference, see definitions of 'text-anchor' in SVG1.1[1] and >SVGT1.2[2], and the sections on bidi handling[3][4]. FWIW I think 1.2T >conveys the intent of the SVG 1.1 spec, so I think backporting the changes >made for the RTL text tests in the 1.2T testsuite to the SVG1.1F2 >testsuite would be reasonable. > >Cheers >/Erik > >[1] >http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/text.html#TextAnchorProperty >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/text.html#TextAnchorProperty >[3] >http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/text.html#RelationshipWithBiDirectionality >[4] >http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/text.html#RelationshipWithBiDirectionality > >-- >Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software >Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group >Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed > >
Received on Friday, 19 March 2010 21:38:56 UTC