W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: RTL text alignment tests in SVG 1.1

From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:37:10 +1100
Message-Id: <YDTJZK.B5MFDI26OLEN@abbra.com>
To: "Erik Dahlstrom" <ed@opera.com>
Cc: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Erik,

	I agree totally with what you propose. If you'd like me to
review the changed tests, feel free to ask.

Cheers,
Alex

--Original Message--:
>Hello,
>
>I'm wondering what to do with the RTL testcases in SVG1.1F2, which are  
>affected by the clarified wording for RTL text alignment in SVGT1.2.
>
>This affects this test:
>
>   http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/test/svg/fonts-glyph-02-t.svg
>
>which has a counterpart in the SVGT1.2 testsuite:
>
>   http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/htmlObjectHarness/fonts-glyph-02-t.html
>
>For reference, see definitions of 'text-anchor' in SVG1.1[1] and  
>SVGT1.2[2], and the sections on bidi handling[3][4]. FWIW I think 1.2T  
>conveys the intent of the SVG 1.1 spec, so I think backporting the changes  
>made for the RTL text tests in the 1.2T testsuite to the SVG1.1F2  
>testsuite would be reasonable.
>
>Cheers
>/Erik
>
>[1]  
>http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/text.html#TextAnchorProperty
>[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/text.html#TextAnchorProperty
>[3]  
>http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.1F2/publish/text.html#RelationshipWithBiDirectionality
>[4]  
>http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGTiny12/text.html#RelationshipWithBiDirectionality
>
>-- 
>Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
>Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
>Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
>
>
Received on Friday, 19 March 2010 21:38:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:43 UTC