- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:10:47 +0100
- To: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <551590633.20100303161047@w3.org>
This is a forwarded message From: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com> To: "w3c-css-wg@w3.org" <w3c-css-wg@w3.org> Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 2:48:26 PM Subject: Agenda conf call 03-mar-2010 ===8<==============Original message text=============== I would like to additionally request that everybody read my follow-up on image-fit and image-position. [1] It contains a compromise proposal I believe would be acceptable to all. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Mar/0028.html -- Leif Arne Storset Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Oslo, Norway ===8<===========End of original message text=========== HÃ¥kon summarised this proposal as: 'image-fit: fill' to impose filling for all media 'image-fit: auto' to establish the content box and leave it to the media to determine exact filling would that be suitable for SVG? I'm uncomfortable with leaving rendering un(der)defined, but more comfortable with that than specifying something unworkable which breaks current content and would be confusing when applied to SVG or mixed HTML/SVG. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Attachments
- TEXT/PLAIN attachment: attachment397.txt
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 15:10:50 UTC