- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:51:30 +1000
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4A949522.6070604@cisra.canon.com.au>
Hi Cameron, I've reviewed the test and it looks fine to me. Attached to this email is the test with a minor add on which has the word "FAIL" in fill correct colour of each sub tests (except for auto). If a colour in one of the subtests is wrong, the word "FAIL" becomes visible. Feel free to add this to the current test. Cheers, Anthony Chris Lilley wrote: > On Thursday, August 6, 2009, 7:41:04 AM, Anthony wrote: > > AG> Hi Cameron, > > AG> Cameron McCormack wrote: >>> Consider the following document: > >>> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> >>> <rect width='200' height='100'/> >>> <g fill='white' fill-opacity='0.5'> >>> <rect width='100' height='100'/> >>> <rect x='100' width='100' height='100' color-interpolation='linearRGB'/> >>> </g> >>> </svg> > >>> Should the right half of the rectangular region be a different colour >>> from the left half? IIUC, the use of ‘color-interpolation’ should >>> affect how the right white <rect> is composited into the black <rect> in >>> the background. > > > AG> Yes. The should be different colours because the 'color-interpolation' affects > AG> how the right <rect> is composited on to the background. > > Right. (it also affects things like gradients). > >>> Batik, Opera and Firefox all show a uniform #808080 colour in the >>> rectangular region, which makes me wonder if I’ve used the >>> ‘color-interpolation’ correctly. > > > AG> Opera 10 shows a uniform #7E7E7E for me. > > AG> To my understanding: > AG> - the left <rect> should be #7F7F7F > AG> - the right <rect> should be #BBBBBB > > Yes. > > So, lets have that slapped into a test. > I added all the other values for color-interpolation to the attached. > > > >
Attachments
- image/svg+xml attachment: painting-render-02-b.svg
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 01:52:23 UTC