- From: Lee Martineau <lee.martineau@quickoffice.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:57:48 -0500
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: "public-svg-wg@w3.org" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Doug, Interpreting "highly perceivable indication of error" to be that the UA simply stops rendering works for me. Thanks. -- Lee > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org] > Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:31 AM > To: Lee Martineau > Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: More on circular references (ACTION-2494) > > Hi, Lee- > > This was discussed at great length last year, and we decided that in > fact, it is an error. Andrew Emmons was involved in those discussions > on behalf of BitFlash, so it's odd to see this come up now. Since SVG > Tiny 1.2 is now a Recommendation, it would be really difficult to make > such a change now. > > We did make provision for UA-dependent "recursion buffer" in the spec > already (and this is how the circular-reference test is structured). In > 14.1.4 Reference restrictions, we say: > > [[ > A circular IRI reference is an error. Because SVG user agents may vary > on when they first detect and abort a circular reference, conforming SVG > document fragments must not rely upon circular references. > ]] > > Also, SVG Tiny has more forgiving error handling than SVG 1.1; you no > longer have to "halt and catch fire", and you can change your error > handling as appropriate for each particular type of error. It should be > acceptable in the case of recursion for the "highly perceivable > indication of error" to be that the UA simply stops rendering the > results of the recursion (that is, at the point where your UA detects > that this is a problem, you simply don't follow the circular reference > anymore). This, in combination with the already permissive wording that > leaves it up to the UA to decide when to abort circular references , > should give you the flexibility you're after. > > Please let us know if this resolves your issue. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#ReferenceRestrictions > > Regards- > -Doug > > Lee Martineau wrote (on 3/19/09 8:08 AM): > > Hello WG, > > > > As Cameron said in the March 16 telcon minutes, the objective is to > > eliminate having to provide "a highly perceivable indication of > > error". > > > > In an embedded situation, there is generally no capability for > > logging or displaying error information to the end user, so any error > > condition that can reasonably be handled within the user agent is > > simply handled. > > > > In anticipation of Doug's request for how to soften the circular > > reference error processing, I have provided a possible approach > > below. > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/struct.html#UseElement > > > > Just before the schema is this sentence: > > > > "However, a set of references that directly or indirectly reference a > > [sic] element to create a circular dependency is an error, as > > described in the References section." > > > > How about: > > > > "However, a set of references that directly or indirectly reference > > an element to create a circular dependency must be detected by the > > user agent. The user agent may choose to handle the situation as an > > error (as described in the References section) or it may continue > > rendering until an implementation dependent limit on recursive > > processing is reached." > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#ReferenceRestrictions > > > > Buried in here is: > > > > "A circular IRI reference is an error." > > > > How about: > > > > "A circular IRI reference must be detected by the user agent. Yada > > yada..." > > > > -- Lee Martineau > >
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 13:58:34 UTC