- From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:28:42 +1100
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On 12/03/2009, at 7:59 AM, Doug Schepers wrote: > > >> it would be good if the SVG >> proposal was in an equivalent state. I think putting editorial notes >> into the document would be enough. > > That seems fair. Anthony, can you put in notes regarding open > issues into the spec? Dean, I guess you'll be incorporating our > feedback in a similar manner? I think there is a big difference between my feedback and your feedback. I'm not trying to be a jerk here, but there are significant flaws in the current SVG approach, whereas your comments on CSS were on specific functionality. I've responded to the SVG comments in detail on the public list, and will definitely incorporate the suggestions indicated in the feedback. For the ones I disagree with, they'll remain as open issues (I'll set up the issue tracking once there is a published draft to track). I don't want to change the current draft at the moment unless it is related to pubrules (and I'm out-of-the-loop wrt publication unless Bert contacts me). > When does the CSS WG plan to publish, at this point? The SVG WG > doesn't think you need to incorporate all our feedback, if that > delays publication. We would rather publish faster, and then > coordinate based on public feedback. Right, this isn't a big deal. Dean
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 21:29:26 UTC