- From: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:55:16 +1100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, Do you still plan to publish the SVG transforms proposal at the same time as the CSS proposal? If so, I think you should either try to address the comments I gave last week, or put notes into the specification indicating the areas of fuzziness. In general I don't think first public working drafts need to be anywhere near perfect (it seems the CSS WG have a higher bar). However, since you've fast-tracked the publication of the SVG proposal in order to "avoid confusion" with the CSS proposal it would be good if the SVG proposal was in an equivalent state. I think putting editorial notes into the document would be enough. The main points are the rendering model and the confusion over whether you want 3d or compatibility with OpenVG. Syntax issues are probably less important. Dean
Received on Wednesday, 11 March 2009 19:55:59 UTC