W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

RelaxNG schema for SVG 1.1

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:08:55 +1100
To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20090211070855.GA13362@arc.mcc.id.au>

I came across this:


Should we verify that it’s correct and then include it in the SVG 1.1
Second Edition?  If so, normative or non-normative?  (Presumably the
normativity of the SVG 1.1 DTD is limited to its ability to determine
that a given document is definitely not a conforming SVG 1.1 document,
and that it cannot say that a document is a confomring one.  If the RNG
is OK, then I wouldn’t see a problem with having it similarly

Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 07:09:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:41 UTC