- From: SVG Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 00:03:42 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-2221 (test-coverage-attrs-11): Missing test coverage for SVG 1.1 attributes [SVG Full 1.1] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2221 Raised by: Cameron McCormack On product: SVG Full 1.1 The following attributes are not tested in the SVG 1.1 test suite: accent-height on <font-face> bbox on <font-face> bias on <feConvolveMatrix> by on <animateMotion> contentScriptType on <svg> contentStyleType on <svg> divisor on <feConvolveMatrix> dx and dy on <tref>, <altGlyph> and <glyphRef> externalResourcesRequired filterRes font-size, font-stretch on <font-face> format on <altGlyph> and <glyphRef> (might be hard to test) glyphRef on <altGlyph> and <glyphRef> horiz-origin-y on <font> kernelUnitLength media on <style> method on <textPath> onabort onbegin (tested obliquely in animate-dom-01-f) onend onerror onrepeat onresize onscroll onunload onzoom orientation on <glyph> overline-position and overline-thickness on <font-face> preserveAspectRatio on <marker> and <pattern> rotate on <tref> and <altGlyph> seed on <feTurbulence> spacing on <textPath> stemh and stemv on <font-face> stitchTiles on <feTurbulence> strikethrough-position and strikethrough-thickness on <font-face> targetX and targetY on <feConvolveMatrix> textLength on <tspan>, <tref> and <textPath> transform on <clipPath> underline-position and underline-thickness on <font-face> v-alphabetic, v-hanging, v-ideographic and v-mathemtical on <font-face> vert-adv-y, vert-origin-x and vert-origin-y on <font-face>, <glyph> and <missing-glyph> viewBox on <pattern> widths on <font-face> x and y on <tref> and <altGlyph> zoomAndPan on <view> There is no test for <font-face font-style="oblique">. There are no tests for <font-face font-weight> for values other than "normal" and "bold". There are no tests for <marker orient> for values other than "auto". There is no test for <filter primitiveUnits="objectBoundingBox">. More comprehensive tests for unicode-range would be good, given the complex values it can have. (The only value tested at the moment is "U+0-7F".)
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2009 00:03:50 UTC