- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:58:13 +1100
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Cam and Doug, In the transforms module we were thinking of having an attribute/property called "transform-origin". The property would allow <x> <y> <z> to specified as a percentage of the bounding box or using a key word like is listed below ('left', 'right', 'center'). Additionally, User Space coordinates can be specified for <x> <y> <z> Not sure if this helpful for this issue though? or if can be merged into the module? Anthony Doug Schepers wrote: > Hi, Cam- > > Cameron McCormack wrote (on 1/29/09 7:33 PM): >> ISSUE-2208: >>> It is very common to rotate an object about its center point. This >>> requires knowing the center point, however, and in some cases this >>> can't be known without scripting. It would be handy to be able to >>> specify that a rotation happens about the center point, e.g.: >>> >>> <svg ...> >>> <text x='50' y='50' transform='rotate(-90, center)'/> >>> </svg> > > Amen. > > >> “center” here would mean bounding box center. I could imagine other >> keywords being introduced to mean other, particular points on the >> object. These keywords would be the same as those that we might define >> for the Layout module. > > In addition to keywords regarding the bbox (top-left, mid-right), we > might allow definition of points along the stroke itself, such as > distance along the length, or even points inside the shape, though that > might be hard to do in any meaningful way. > > An alternative would be allowing a reference point for the rotation: > > <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"> > <path d="M89,107 L70,89 51,107 53,81 27,78 49,63 35,41 60,49 > 69,24 79,48 103,41 90,63 112,77 86,81 89,107Z" > fill="orange" stroke="red" transform="rotate(45, #point_1)"/> > <point id="point_1" cx="90" cy="72" /> > </svg> > > > Or something like that. > > >> “centroid” could be another one, but I’m not sure how useful that would >> be. > > Yeah, that occurred to me too... but I'm also not sure of its usefulness. > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs > >
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 03:58:56 UTC