- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:37:48 +0100
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Thursday, January 22, 2009, 7:21:39 AM, Cameron wrote: CM> Hello WG, and Chris in particular. CM> Now that SVG Tiny 1.2 is a Recommendation, we can get image/svg+xml CM> registered. I see that the last time comments were solicited on CM> Appendix M[1] was late 2005[2]. The text in that mail seems to be the CM> same as what was eventually published in the Recommendation. Yes. CM> There was some discussion in that thread. I gather from the lack of CM> change to Appendix M that you (Chris) took those comments on board but CM> came to the conclusion that no further changes were necessary? Correct. Well in fact its a little more complicated. The comments were made in the context of RFC 3023, which has a problem, which the TAG pointed out some years ago, which will be fixed by a replacement to RFC 3023, which I started editing, and then got distracted by other stuff. Since yours is the third reminder this week that i need to get cracking on publishing son-of-3023 i will try to get to it asap. CM> If so, CM> then would you be able to continue with the appropriate procedure[3] to CM> get the registration completed? Yes, once 3023-replacement is published as an Internet Draft. Our registration template is already in conformance with it. CM> Thanks, CM> Cameron CM> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SVGTiny12-20081222/mimereg.html CM> [2] CM> http://www.alvestrand.no/pipermail/ietf-types/2005-December/000902.html CM> [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype.html -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 15:37:57 UTC