- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:51:34 -0500
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi, Guys- Cameron McCormack wrote (on 1/8/09 8:38 PM): > > Chris Lilley: >> ACTION-2188 >> Ask Tantek for advice on adding rev >> >> The information is already covered in the microformats FAQ: >> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-faq#Then_what_does_rev_mean >> http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-faq#Should_rev_even_be_used >> >> Should 'rev' even be used? > … >> The short answer is unfortunately "NO". Use of "rev" SHOULD be >> avoided. >> >> However, VoteLinks' use of rev has been grandfathered since it was >> such an early use. > >> Subject: Re: Rev should not be added to SVG > > @rev was already added to SVG Tiny 1.2. Should we remove it? I don't believe so. I was aware of the guidance against @rev in microformats, but for legacy content, it still is used for at least VoteLinks. But more importantly, it is still used in RDFa, which is equally important to enable: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#relValues Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Friday, 9 January 2009 01:51:44 UTC