- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:00:41 +0200
- To: SVG Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Tuesday, April 14, 2009, 6:38:27 AM, SVG wrote: SWGIT> ISSUE-2262 (svgcolor-method-params): Inaccuracies in SVGColor SWGIT> method descriptions [SVG Full 1.1] SWGIT> http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2262 SWGIT> Raised by: Cameron McCormack SWGIT> On product: SVG Full 1.1 SWGIT> The descriptions of the methods on SVGColor do not state what SWGIT> syntax the DOMString parameters must take. There should be SWGIT> links to the <color> definition, and there should be a new SWGIT> definition for <icc-color> syntax. Yes. I'm working on a grammar for that (prompted by Erik) for SVG Color; the same definition could be reused here. SWGIT> Also, SVGColor::setColor() says that the parameters take an SWGIT> "RGBColor object" and an "SVGICCColor" object, but I suspect SWGIT> that should say that they are strings that represent an RGB or SWGIT> SVG ICC color (as you would use in, say, the 'flood-color' property). I agree. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 16 April 2009 13:00:51 UTC