- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:20:34 +1100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hi Krzysztof. Krzysztof Maczyński: > One more thing. Is there a need for wording in the spec concerning > the uDOM (especially SVGGlobal, AbstractView and Window interfaces) > when the document type is not SVG but one or more SVG fragments are > embedded? In general we have shied away from including conformance requirements for such documents (apart from a couple of cases that were brought up by implementors, such as script element and resource document handling). With increasing interest in mixing HTML and SVG, this will surely be something we’ll look at for Core. There seems to be rough consensus among implementors that all such global interfaces are implemented on the global object, regardless of the root element of the document that is currently loaded, though. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2008 23:36:51 UTC