- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 22:40:58 +1100
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- CC: SVG Working Group WG <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi Cameron, The SVG Working Group agrees that animating @transform with <set> is very useful. We intend on performing a comprehensive review and address this issue in the next version of the SVG specification. Please let us know at your earliest convenience if this response is satisfactory. Kind Regards, Anthony Grasso. SVG Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: > > ISSUE-2166 (animating-transform-set): Animating @transform with <set> [Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny ] > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2166 > > Raised by: Cameron McCormack > On product: Last Call: SVG 1.2 Tiny > > Cameron McCormack <http://www.w3.org/mid/20081023004437.GF20693@arc.mcc.id.au>: > > [[[ > I see in the table in 16.2.18 that transform lists can be animated only > with the <animateTransform> element. It seems to me that it would be > useful to allow animating with <set>, since otherwise to perform a > discrete animation of @transform you must do a very short continuous > animation, like: > > <animateTransform attributeName="transform" type="scale" to="10" > dur=".001"/> > > Opera already allows using <set> on @transform. Batik doesn't, but > could easily be changed to allow this. > ]]] > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 28 October 2008 11:41:52 UTC