W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-svg-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

RE: Updated/split test

From: Niklas Hagelroth <niklas.hagelroth@ikivo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:43:13 +0200
Message-ID: <234EB4699C751A4A95DF4FD8D041BBFD0106910D@SESTHSRV10.zoomon.local>
To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>, "Lee Martineau" <lee.martineau@quickoffice.com>, "SVG Working Group WG" <public-svg-wg@w3.org>


Yes, Ikivo pass struct-use-205 revision 1.6.

I'm still not convinced that the 4th subtest that is moved to struct-use-210 is corrected. Can you please point me to the correct section in the specification that proves this test correct?

Also, since the test is so complicated and hard to find evidence for in the specification I would like to see links to the tested specification sections in the tests description.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erik Dahlström [mailto:ed@opera.com]
> Sent: den 24 oktober 2008 15:09
> To: Lee Martineau; Niklas Hagelroth
> Subject: Updated/split test
> Hi,
> I would like to ask for an update of test results from Ikivo and
> Quickoffice for the struct-use-205 test[1] (revision 1.6) (the test was
> split into two, and the hope is that this makes it easier for people to
> pass it). This is one of the last few "at-risk" tests.
> If the results could be posted to the public-svg-wg list as soon as
> possible that would be great. Note that the results still need to be
> verified by the w3c staff.
> Cheers
> /Erik
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/svg/struct-use-205-t.svg
> --
> Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software
> Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
> Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 13:44:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:29:40 UTC