- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 19:31:46 +1100
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Chris Lilley: > We agree that an invalid IRI means its not rendered; and if its not in > the tree it wont be rendered anyway so there is no need to throw in > that case. > > We also think that inserting an invalid IRI would not throw on > setTrait, because then set would need to resolve the IRI. Instead, it > will disable rendering, when rendering occurs. So we agree there is no > need to throw then either. > > You have ACTION-2333, to fix the spec accordingly. I agree and will make the change. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Friday, 24 October 2008 08:32:25 UTC