- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:57:12 +1100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hello WG. New wording that was recently added for paced animation of rotations is: Note, that the formula ensures only a paced animation interpolation, if the rotation center remains unchanged within the animation. Authors may not use paced animation interpolation if the angle is not changed at all to prevent problems for the user agent. — http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/animate.html#complexDistances It’s not clear to me what that second sentence means. Should it in fact be the opposite (i.e., if the angle is changed at all)? I don’t know what sort of problems a user agent may have if an attempt is made to perform a paced animation of a rotation that includes a change in centre point, since the distance formula is clearly defined. I suggest that it be reworded as: Note that the distance formula for rotation transformations is defined only in terms of the angles and not the center points. Thus, if paced animation of a rotation transformation that does include a change in center point is performed, the result may not look truly paced. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 00:57:52 UTC