- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:04:49 +1100
- To: public-svg-wg@w3.org
Hello WG. I think the example used for the definition of the 'opacity' property is far too complex to be included inline, and should be simplified. It is currently a copy of the struct-image-201 test, which actually has been removed from the test suite for whatever reason (probably something to do with the “This test is not valid 1.2 Tiny because …” note). -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 2008 05:05:27 UTC