- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:26:42 +0200
- To: Lee Martineau <lee.martineau@quickoffice.com>
- CC: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
Hi, Lee- Thanks for the update. I've updated the matrix: http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/results/TestFestTPAC-atrisk-verify.html The most important ones that are still at risk that BitFlash doesn't pass are: media-audio-206-t.svg struct-use-205-t.svg Is there any chance that you could get those working by Thursday? Thanks- -Doug Lee Martineau wrote (on 10/15/08 1:31 PM): > Hello WG, > > > > Just an update on the BitFlash implementation status from the testfest. > > > > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/results/TestFestTPAC-atrisk-verify.html > > The following at-risk files which were PARTIAL are now PASS: > > linking-frag-203-t.svg > > media-video-215-t.svg > > styling-inherit-03-t.svg > > > > The following actions corresponding to the above can marked as Pending > Review I guess? > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2260 > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2265 (refers to > video-202, should be video-215 I assume) > > http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/actions/2267 > > > > The status of text-align-202-t.svg and text-layout-201-t.svg is unclear. > Are there updated reference slides to compare with? > > > > Result of recent updates: > > udom-svg-220-t.svg, rev. 1.12, FAIL,as before > > udom-svg-224-t.svg, rev. 1.7, PASS, as before > > > > -- > > Lee Martineau > > Quickoffice, BitFlash Division > > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2008 10:26:59 UTC