- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:16:22 +0200
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Wednesday, October 15, 2008, 8:43:18 PM, Doug wrote: DS> Hi, Chris, others- DS> Chris Lilley wrote (on 10/10/08 3:14 PM): >> This email relates to ACTION-2276 Respond to Fantasia on ISSUE-2058 >> saying we added direction, unicode-bidi and a test >> and >> ISSUE-2058 Lack of BIDI 'direction' >> I sent an email to Fantasia with cc to the other lists, indicating >> that we agreed with her comment and had updated the spec accordingly >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2008Oct/0070.html DS> Cameron's make script warns about these both, because they are not DS> animatable: DS> [[ DS> Dubious: non-animatable property 'direction' found. DS> Dubious: non-animatable property 'unicode-bidi' found. DS> ]] DS> This seems to be an assumption in the make script that thinks that all DS> properties should be animatable. I don't know if this is a spurious DS> assumption, or if perhaps we should examine whether that's true. It seems to be an unjustified assumption. DS> Your text and schema certainly matches the values from SVG 1.1, where it DS> was also not animatable, but I couldn't think why that should be. What DS> is the rationale for them not being animatable? I don't know. However, since we agreed to restore this feature from 1.1, I did exactly what 1.1 did. DS> It's not a big deal either way, but I was curious because of the warning DS> flag. That warning does not have any spec to back it up. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Friday, 17 October 2008 15:04:27 UTC