- From: Anthony Grasso <anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:59:46 +1000
- To: W3C SVG Public Working Group <public-svg-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-minutes.html --- [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - SVG Working Group Teleconference 10 Oct 2008 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-irc Attendees Present [IPcaller], ed, Doug_Schepers, anthony, lmartine Regrets Chair Erik Scribe anthony Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]Last Call Comments 2. [5]ISSUE-2082 3. [6]ISSUE-2083 4. [7]ISSUE-2084 5. [8]Implementation Matrix * [9]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 10 October 2008 <ed> [10]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html [10] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html <ed> we'll work on actions and read the LC comments and dial in in half an hour <shepazu> I'm here... anything I can do? how are the Dr. Olaf comments going? <ed> we're reading them... <ed> if you haven't please do so, we'll dial in in 10 mins <ed> I think ISSUE-2082 is something me might be able to move to core <shepazu> k <ed> he's right though, auto sucks if we followed what is in the spec ;) <scribe> scribe: anthony Last Call Comments ISSUE-2082 <ed> [11]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2082 [11] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2082 ISSUE-2082? <trackbot> ISSUE-2082 -- attributeType auto -- RAISED <trackbot> [12]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2082 [12] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2082 ED: I think he's right ... I think this is something we could postpone for SVG Core instead ... because I'd like to make tests for this to figure out what would be the most use friendly ... with his example it shows that a CSS width and height may not apply to a rect AG: How would you change it? ... you'd have to reword it I guess ... I reckon put it on hold and move to the next one DS: Same wording as 1.1 ... so what's the reason for putting it off? ED: CSS styling is not required for Tiny ... and we haven't tested what implementations are doing DS: We will address this in Core time frame <scribe> ACTION: Anthony to Draft a response for ISSUE-2082 [recorded in [13]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-2289 - Draft a response for ISSUE-2082 [on Anthony Grasso - due 2008-10-17]. Resolution: We agree with the comment, but we will address it in Core where it is more relevant ISSUE-2083 ISSUE-2083? <trackbot> ISSUE-2083 -- Paced animation and complex types -- RAISED <trackbot> [14]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2083 [14] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2083 ED: I think we have made some fixes ... what worries me he says we have two tests for calc mode paced ... and they are incorrect ... we currently have two implementations passing those ... All implementations pass animate-elem-82 ... if what he's saying is correct is we have to change the specs or the tests (and then get implementations to pass) <ed> ...majority of impls. pass animate-elem-53 <scribe> scribe: anthony DS: I'm wondering if implementations would pass his alternative ED: I guess we can dig it up <ed> [15]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/0646.h tml [15] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/0646.html <shepazu> [16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2006Aug/0037.html [16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2006Aug/0037.html <shepazu> [17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2007Jan/0041.html [17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2007Jan/0041.html <shepazu> [18]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2007Jan/0036.html [18] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2007Jan/0036.html <shepazu> [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2007Jan/0040.html [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2007Jan/0040.html DS: Considering we are planning on doing improved animation in the future perhaps this is something we could address later on <ed> [20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/att-06 46/scalepaced01.svg [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/att-0646/scalepaced01.svg <ed> [21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/att-06 46/translatepaced01.svg [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/att-0646/translatepaced01.svg <ed> [22]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/att-06 46/rotatepaced01.svg [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2007JanMar/att-0646/rotatepaced01.svg ED: Those are tests for paced animations ... I think that's what he's talking about when he submitted some tests on the list ... but those haven't been reviewed DS: So what are we going to do about the issue? ED: Would be good if Cameron were here to look at it ... I'll send an email to Cameron ... if the tests are incorrect we'll either have to change them or remove them ISSUE-2084 ISSUE-2084? <trackbot> ISSUE-2084 -- 16.2.9 values attribute 'extended syntax' -- RAISED <trackbot> [23]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2084 [23] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2084 <ed> [24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/000 4.html related? [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-svg-wg/2008JulSep/0004.html <shepazu> [25]http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/animate.html#Inheritance ? [25] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/animate.html#Inheritance <ed> [26]http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2010 [26] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/WG/track/issues/2010 ED: There is an ISSUE-2010 for 1.1. which is close <ed> [27]http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/animate.html#ValuesAttribute [27] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/animate.html#ValuesAttribute ED: He is commenting on the second paragraph on the values list <shepazu> [28]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/animate.html#ValueAt tributes [28] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/animate.html#ValueAttributes DS: What existing content are we talking about here? Is this is something generated by one of the authoring tools? ED: I think so. I think Cameron made some tests for this AG: I do recall a discussion on this DS: Didn't we decide this didn't matter that much ED: So he's saying we should remove that paragraph all together DS: That's what it looks like ED: Just wondering if we'd have trouble by removing that DS: I think we decided it didn't have a strong use case to object to use correcting the error here ... and we knew that there was content out there because of authoring tools ... I'm tempted to reject the comment saying that we've already discussed this and that it is a less than ideal solution in the spec ... but it's due to auto generation of content rather than hand authored ... it's something we can revisit at a later date RESOLUTION: We've already made a decision on this issue to accommodate output from existing authoring tools and we may revisit it later <scribe> ACTION: Doug to Reply to Dr. Hoffmann regarding ISSUE-2084 [recorded in [29]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-minutes.html#action02] <trackbot> Created ACTION-2290 - Reply to Dr. Hoffmann regarding ISSUE-2084 [on Doug Schepers - due 2008-10-17]. Implementation Matrix <shepazu> [30]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/results/TestFestOttawa. html [30] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/test/results/TestFestOttawa.html DS: There are 20 tests that are at risk ... implementations that fix them should go ahead an update this HTML matrix ... and then we will spot test verify at TPAC <shepazu> [31]http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/ [31] http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/ Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Anthony to Draft a response for ISSUE-2082 [recorded in [32]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: Doug to Reply to Dr. Hoffmann regarding ISSUE-2084 [recorded in [33]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-minutes.html#action02] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [34]scribe.perl version 1.133 ([35]CVS log) $Date: 2008/10/10 12:53:06 $ _________________________________________________________ [34] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [35] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.] This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at [36]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002 /scribe/ [36] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/82/animate-elem-82/ Succeeded: s/change the specs, tests and implementations/change the spe cs or the tests (and then get implementations to pass)/ Found Scribe: anthony Inferring ScribeNick: anthony Found Scribe: anthony Inferring ScribeNick: anthony WARNING: Replacing list of attendees. Old list: ed [IPcaller] anthony lmartine New list: lmartine ed Doug_Schepers anthony Default Present: [IPcaller], ed, Doug_Schepers, anthony, lmartine Present: [IPcaller] ed Doug_Schepers anthony lmartine Found Date: 10 Oct 2008 Guessing minutes URL: [37]http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-minutes.html People with action items: anthony doug [37] http://www.w3.org/2008/10/10-svg-minutes.html End of [38]scribe.perl diagnostic output] [38] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
Received on Friday, 10 October 2008 13:00:29 UTC