- From: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:49:48 +0200
- To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
- Cc: public-svg-wg@w3.org
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 02:03:50 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Erik Dahlström: >> > In SVG 1.1 the 'correspondingUseElement' is of type 'SVGUseElement' [1]. >> > In tiny it's of type 'SVGElement' [2]. >> > >> > The uDOM currently doesn't have the SVGUseElement interface, but I >> > think it might be more consistent if we introduced it as an empty >> > interface inheriting from SVGElement. > > Doug Schepers: >> Seems reasonable to me. > > Me too. Note that JSR 287 declares correspondingUseElement to be of > type SVGElement, but this wouldn’t cause any existing code not to > compile. Hearing no objections I went ahead and made the change, it shouldn't really affect existing implementations much, it's mostly for consistency with SVG 1.1. Cheers /Erik -- Erik Dahlstrom, Core Technology Developer, Opera Software Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Personal blog: http://my.opera.com/macdev_ed
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 13:48:07 UTC